Creatine ethyl ester anabolic growth pills tablets

I used creatine 8 or so years ago, had great gains, ( it was the exact same product then & dont tell me its gotten better becasue its effervescent or some .) But I also had a frequent & uncomfortable need to urinate that was NOT just from consuming extra liquid, but from my kidneys being put on overload & doing damage to them with this stuff. I drank plenty of water, took a little less than the recommended dose & was having the urination problem for years after the use of creatine… I also was very short tempered with my family & young kids at the time I took it as it altered my mood.
I also have a friend who underwent a kidney transplant, that if he didnt get, he would have died . the reason for his kidney failure was creatine & he would tell you to stay far away from it as it almost costed him his life. This stuff is absolutely no good-

I am bewildered by the amount of questions in this list that had the answers in the above article about Creatine. All you had to do was read "all of it", and pretty much every question in this list was answered. As I find with numerous topics on any internet post, people are just too lazy to read the whole article and just ask a question for a "spoon fed answer", instead of reading the whole article, which was extremely in depth. If you are too lazy to read this article yourself, I'm guessing you don't have the necessary dedication to stick to a well thought out training routine, and have a diet specifically for your own personal goals. So "Creatine" isn't going to help those lazy types. "Read the whole article". Get some dedication, and get some goals and do the necessary things to achieve those goals. "On your own". No one is going to hold your hand at the gym.

One more form of creatine, creatine hydrochloride (Cr-HCl) is claimed to be better absorbed than regular CrM, and thus only a 2 gram dose is required to yield similar benefits in terms of muscular strength (Stoppani, 2013). There is no published research supporting this statement, yet it’s marketed with the claim of being superior to monohydrate. This is fine, as it is still creatine and at a does of 3 -5 grams per day it will still saturate your muscles. The marketing suggests 2 grams, which is not enough to lead to significant performance benefits. And no, you can’t take it and say you “felt” like it impacted your exercise. That’s not how research works.

You'll notice there are surprisingly few arguments in favour of CEE, and those that are there are weak. Yet it remains a very popular product. This is because the anecdotal evidence for it is very strong; a large number of users, who got on well with creatine monohydrate, are positive their gains were even better with CEE. But anecdotal evidence is weak evidence... isn't it? Yes it is, but it's also very powerful evidence, and couple this with strong marketing campaigns from the supplement companies, you'll have an argument in favour of CEE which over-rides any negative information from other sources. After all, isn't this what most supplement sales are based on, . people's claims and strong marketing? And we know from using them, that a lot of supplements really have very little positive effects. Yet supplements sell, and sell well. Could CEE in reality, fall into this category? Is CEE just a heavily marketed supplement fad?

Creatine ethyl ester , also known as creatine ester , cre-ester and CEE , is a substance sold as an aid for athletic performance and for muscle development in bodybuilding . It is an ethyl ester derivative of creatine , from which it is made. In the body, CEE is converted back into creatine. [ citation needed ] CEE is said to have a much better absorption rate and a longer half-life in the body than regular creatine monohydrate , because it is slightly more lipophilic . [ citation needed ] It is also proposed to bypass the creatine transporter, thereby increasing skeletal muscle uptake of creatine and leading to an increased ability to regenerate ATP. [1] However, in a published study comparing the two, CEE was not as effective at increasing serum and muscle creatine levels or in improving body composition, muscle mass, strength, and power. [1] The same study found CEE to be comparable to placebo.

Creatine ethyl ester anabolic growth pills tablets

creatine ethyl ester anabolic growth pills tablets

You'll notice there are surprisingly few arguments in favour of CEE, and those that are there are weak. Yet it remains a very popular product. This is because the anecdotal evidence for it is very strong; a large number of users, who got on well with creatine monohydrate, are positive their gains were even better with CEE. But anecdotal evidence is weak evidence... isn't it? Yes it is, but it's also very powerful evidence, and couple this with strong marketing campaigns from the supplement companies, you'll have an argument in favour of CEE which over-rides any negative information from other sources. After all, isn't this what most supplement sales are based on, . people's claims and strong marketing? And we know from using them, that a lot of supplements really have very little positive effects. Yet supplements sell, and sell well. Could CEE in reality, fall into this category? Is CEE just a heavily marketed supplement fad?

Media:

creatine ethyl ester anabolic growth pills tabletscreatine ethyl ester anabolic growth pills tabletscreatine ethyl ester anabolic growth pills tabletscreatine ethyl ester anabolic growth pills tabletscreatine ethyl ester anabolic growth pills tablets

http://buy-steroids.org